Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 304.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, having an 85.4 score against 78.5. The LG K92 design is newer and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Action's, but it is somewhat heavier. Motorola One Action counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a bit better pixel density.
LG K92 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola One Action, and although the LG K92 has more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The LG K92 has a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back camera. The LG K92 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
LG K92 is more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.