Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a 78.5 score against 76.7. The Motorola One Action design is lighter than the LG Stylo 6, but it's a little bit thicker and was released about 9 months before. The LG Stylo 6 features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Action. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Action has a bit better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little bit greater pixel density. Motorola One Action features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Action also counts with a lot better video resolution. LG Stylo 6 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Action, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.