Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, getting a general score of 78.6 against 78.5. The LG V10 design is just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Action, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before. The Motorola One Action has a quite superior performance than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has 7 more CPU cores.
LG V10 has a better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The LG V10 has a superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG V10 also has a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution camera and better 120 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola One Action features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Action has a bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V10 is also cheap compared to the Motorola One Action, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.