Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with an 82.5 score against 78.5. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Motorola One Action, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a much better resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Motorola One Action counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.