Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola One Action, with an 81.3 score against 78.5. LG V35 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Action, although it was released a little bit more than a year before. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola One Action counts with a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola One Action features just a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video and a much more MP back camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.