Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola One Action, with an 81.2 score against 78.5. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Action, even though it was released just 10 months before. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a just a bit greater display pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same resolution camera in the back, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and faster video frame rate.
The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.