Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola One Action, having a overall score of 87.6 against 78.5. LG V60 ThinQ's body is a little bit thinner but heavier than the Motorola One Action, and they were released only 7 months apart. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
Motorola One Action features a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. LG V60 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.