Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Motorola One Action, having an 87.1 score against 78.5. Although LG Velvet is just a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Motorola One Action features a little more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels number per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520.
LG Velvet features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG Velvet features superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity. The LG Velvet takes better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a way more MP camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Velvet is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.