Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Motorola One Action, with a 91.2 score against 78.5. LG Wing is a newer phone than Motorola One Action, although it is much heavier and thicker. Motorola One Action has a little more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG Wing has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola One Action, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
The LG Wing counts with a little better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The LG Wing captures way better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola One Action, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.