Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Motorola One Action, getting a general score of 87.1 against 78.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is much newer and a bit thinner, but heavier than Motorola One Action. The Motorola One Action has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Action, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.