Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a bit better than the Moto G Power, with a 78.5 score against 76.1. The Motorola One Action body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Power, even when they were released only 8 months apart. Motorola One Action counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little bit greater pixel quantity per screen inch.
The Motorola One Action has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features a little faster processor than Moto G Power. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Moto G Power has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Power also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Action, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.