Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 304.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Motorola One Action's body is newer, but just a little bit heavier and a lot thicker than Moto Z Force. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola One Action features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola One Action counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto Z Force and Motorola One Action feature really similar battery performance.
Motorola One Action costs more than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.