Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 304.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Motorola One Action is a extremely newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's notably thicker and heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Action. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a just a little greater pixels density. The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition's camera is very similar to the camera in Motorola One Action, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light environments, they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Motorola One Action has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.