Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. The Motorola One Action is a notably newer phone than Moto Z2 Play, although it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Motorola One Action one, they have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Action has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a quite bigger display. The Motorola One Action counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Action has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola One Action captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Action, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.