Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action, having a 79.8 score against 78.5. The Motorola One Hyper construction is a little thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Action, and both were only released 4 months apart. Motorola One Action has a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper's memory to install games and applications is very similar to the Motorola One Action one, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Hyper has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.