Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Polar night |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 304.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is a little bit better than Motorola One Action, getting an 80.5 score against 78.5. Nokia 8.3 5G's design is newer and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Action's, although it's much heavier. Motorola One Action has a little sharper display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
The Motorola One Action has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 8.3 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a much more MP camera in the back. Nokia 8.3 5G features greater battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Action, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.