Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with an 80.3 score against 78.5. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Motorola One Action. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Action features a bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch and a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Action features more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Motorola One Action also has more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and better video frame rate.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Action, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.