Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView's general score of 76.4. Motorola One Action's construction is a little bit heavier and thicker than the Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView features a slightly better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little more pixels per inch of display.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Nokia 9 PureView takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action. Both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and the same resolution camera.
Motorola One Action counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3320mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Action is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.