Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a bit better than Motorola One Action, with a global score of 80.8 against 78.5. The Nokia XR20 design is newer, but somewhat thicker and way heavier than the Motorola One Action. Nokia XR20's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola One Action, and although the Nokia XR20 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Motorola One Action features a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Nokia XR20 features a superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a camera with way more mega pixels and faster video frame rate. Nokia XR20 counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.