Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. The Motorola One Action construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though they were released only a few months apart. The Motorola One Action features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little bit greater display pixels density.
The Motorola One Action has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with way more MP and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola One Action is also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.