Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a 78.5 score against 76.2. Motorola One Action's construction is lighter and a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released only 13 months before. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Motorola One Action has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better video definition and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The nubia Red Magic 5S features improved battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.