Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro is somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action, it's a little bit thinner and newer. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a little bigger screen, a bit better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much higher resolution back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Action, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features greater battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.