Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 435 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20s's 77 global score. Even though Motorola One Action and the Galaxy A20s were released only 2 months apart, the Motorola One Action design is just a little lighter but somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A20s.
The Motorola One Action has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A20s. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Action has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a much higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The Motorola One Action has a bit better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Action also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Motorola One Action has a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.