Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Motorola One Action, with a 79.9 score against 78.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action, it's a little thinner and way newer. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola One Action features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a back camera with a lot better resolution. Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.