Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. The Galaxy A31 body is a little bit thinner but a little heavier than Motorola One Action, and they were released with only 9 months difference. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola One Action features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Motorola One Action has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A31 takes better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.