Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Motorola One Action, getting a general score of 83.8 against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy A50 and the Motorola One Action were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy A50 is just a bit lighter and thinner. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520.
The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A50 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.