Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's score of 78.5. Galaxy A51's body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola One Action, even though they were released with only 4 months difference. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One Action features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a just a little higher pixel number per inch in the display. Galaxy A51 takes greater videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola One Action counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A51 is also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.