Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is just a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Action, and they were only released 9 months apart. The Motorola One Action features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels in each display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola One Action one, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures much better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A51 5G has better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G is a little more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.