Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Motorola One Action, with a 90.7 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit better pixels number per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has greater battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.