Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 91.3 against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G is a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.