Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, with a 78.5 score against 76.9. The Motorola One Action body is somewhat thicker but just a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and they were only released 4 months apart. The Galaxy A70's processor is just as good as the Motorola One Action one, and although the Galaxy A70 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One Action has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola One Action captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola One Action features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola One Action costs a bit more money than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.