Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola One Action, having a 92.9 score against 78.5. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola One Action, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Motorola One Action counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features as much memory for games and applications as the Motorola One Action, both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much better resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with superior battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.