Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's score of 78.5. Even though the Galaxy Fold and the Motorola One Action were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy Fold's design is much thinner but noticeably heavier than the Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action features a bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, it also counts with a bit better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and higher video frame rates.
Galaxy Fold counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola One Action, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Action, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.