Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's score of 78.5. The Galaxy M20 body is a bit thinner but a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, and they were only released with a couple months difference. Motorola One Action features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola One Action also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit greater pixel quantity per screen inch.
Motorola One Action counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Action has a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Motorola One Action features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.