Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Action's, although it is also a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 has a better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same aperture and a 12 MP camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a way better video resolution.
The Motorola One Action has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Action, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.