Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola One Action, having a overall score of 98.9 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Motorola One Action, but it's heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better display than Motorola One Action, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Motorola One Action's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with much more MP and a lot higher video resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Action, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.