Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action, having an 81.2 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older phone than Motorola One Action, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little inferior pixel count in each inch of display. Motorola One Action has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Motorola One Action has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.