Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Motorola One Action, getting a general score of 80.4 against 78.5. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a lot older than the Motorola One Action, it's design is a little bit lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite higher pixels amount per screen inch.
Motorola One Action has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 9% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a camera that's just as good as the Motorola One Action one, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.