Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Action, although both of them were released only 0 months apart. The Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola One Action also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little higher pixels density. The Motorola One Action counts with a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note10's battery duration is just as good as Motorola One Action's battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.