Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Motorola One Action, having a 93.6 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body is somewhat heavier but thinner than the Motorola One Action, and both were only released 3 months apart. Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper display than Motorola One Action, because it has a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Action has a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 5G has longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a bit more than the Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.