Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 304.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Motorola One Action features a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has as much storage for applications and games as the Motorola One Action one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels and better video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.