Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than Motorola One Action, having a score of 86.3 against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is thinner and lighter than the Motorola One Action, even when they were released with only 5 months difference. Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller screen, they both have a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S10e has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10e takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has higher video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Action counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Galaxy S10e is more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.