Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 94.8 against 78.5. The Galaxy S20 design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Action, although they were released only 7 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 has a better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola One Action one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.