Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 90.8 against 78.5. Galaxy S20 FE's design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Action's, although it's just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE has a display that is just as good as the display in Motorola One Action, because although the Galaxy S20 FE has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola One Action have very similar storage for games and applications, they have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and the same internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has better video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has improved battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.