Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola One Action, having a 98 score against 78.5. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is extremely heavier but just a little thinner than the Motorola One Action, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's memory capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the Motorola One Action one, both of them have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and the same internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution and a much higher video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.