Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is better than Motorola One Action, getting an 89.1 score against 78.5. Galaxy S21 FE is a much newer device, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Action. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE and Motorola One Action have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Galaxy S21 FE features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera, the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has faster video frame rate.
Motorola One Action has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Action, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.