Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Motorola One Action, with a 95.4 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than Motorola One Action's, although it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola One Action, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little better display density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher video definition and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Motorola One Action features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola One Action, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.