Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-16 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting an 82.6 score against 78.5. The Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and noticeably thinner device than the Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action features a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Motorola One Action, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little smaller screen and a little bit lower pixels density. Motorola One Action counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way better video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Action, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.