Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-16 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Motorola One Action, with a 90.7 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One Action. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a quite larger display, a little bit greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Motorola One Action features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action has a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Motorola One Action, because it has a way better video definition, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.