Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than Motorola One Action, with a score of 79.5 against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an way older phone than the Motorola One Action, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola One Action has a little better performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has a higher number of 2200 MHz cores. Motorola One Action has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 12 MP and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Action has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.